<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Protect Consumer Justice &#187; credit cards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/tag/credit-cards/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org</link>
	<description>A source for consumer, legal and political affairs news. Special reports, breaking news and analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:12:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Crafts store chain accused of failing to protect consumer financial data</title>
		<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/crafts-store-chain-accused-of-failing-to-protect-consumer-financial-data.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/crafts-store-chain-accused-of-failing-to-protect-consumer-financial-data.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/?p=4959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chicago Tribune: Two lawsuits seeking class-action status allege Michaels Stores Inc. "failed to safeguard shoppers' credit and debit card information and PIN numbers."
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Chicago Tribune</em>: <strong>Becky Yerak</strong> <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/chibrkbus-michaels-stores-hit-with-classaction-suit-20110531,0,3548690.story" target="_blank">reports</a> <strong>Michaels Stores Inc.</strong>, operators of nearly 1,000 crafts stores in the U.S., &#8220;has been hit with two lawsuits seeking class-action status by consumers  alleging that the arts and crafts retailer failed to safeguard shoppers&#8217;  credit and debit card information and PIN numbers.&#8221; The retailer <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-05-11/business/ct-biz-0512-michaels-20110511_1_debit-card-swipe-pin-pads" target="_blank">had earlier disclosed</a> its checkout PIN pads had been tampered with in 20 states. In the latest lawsuit, a woman said her $18.16 purchase at an Illinois store led to more than $1,000 in unauthorized transactions.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/crafts-store-chain-accused-of-failing-to-protect-consumer-financial-data.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CA Supreme Court rules retailers can&#8217;t ask consumers for ZIP codes</title>
		<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/ca-supreme-court-rules-retailers-cant-ask-consumers-for-zip-codes.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/ca-supreme-court-rules-retailers-cant-ask-consumers-for-zip-codes.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retailers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/?p=4543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times: The California Supreme Court ruled unanimously customer ZIP codes are protected under the state's Credit Card Act.
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Los Angeles Times</em>:  <strong>Maura Dolan</strong> <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/02/merchants-may-not-ask-credit-card-paying-customers-for-their-zip-codes-state-supreme-court-rules.html" target="_blank">reports</a>, &#8220;California merchants may not ask customers who pay with credit cards for  their ZIP codes, the <strong>California Supreme Court</strong> <a href="http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S178241.PDF" target="_blank">decided unanimously</a> Thursday.&#8221;  The court ruled the ZIP code is part of an address and as such is protected under the state&#8217;s <a href="http://www.cardreport.com/laws/california/1747-1748-7.html" target="_blank">Credit Card Act</a>.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/ca-supreme-court-rules-retailers-cant-ask-consumers-for-zip-codes.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banks find more ways to stick their hands in consumers&#8217; pockets</title>
		<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/banks-find-more-ways-to-stick-their-hand-in-consumers-pockets.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/banks-find-more-ways-to-stick-their-hand-in-consumers-pockets.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Page One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/?p=4467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal reporter Jessica Silver-Greenberg says banks are raising minimum payments to try to force late fees, charging for credit protection insurance without permission, and attaching all kinds of fees to prepaid cards that aren't covered by new federal regulations.
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ24/html/PLAW-111publ24.htm" target="_blank"><strong>Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009</strong></a> was enacted to protect consumers from the rapacious behaviors of banks out to maximize their income from various fees charged to account holders and cardholders.  Now, according to <strong>Wall Street Journal</strong> reporter <strong>Jessica Silver-Greenberg</strong>, banks have come up with new ways to squeeze fees out of consumers while staying within the law.</p>
<blockquote><p>Some are raising minimum payments on certain customers&#8217; accounts in  order to increase late penalties. Others are ramping up  credit-protection insurance programs and charging customers for coverage  without permission. Still others are pushing aggressively into high-fee  prepaid cards, which are exempt from most of the new rules.</p>
<p>Banks already have rolled out a slew of new fees since the passage of  the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of  2009. Among other things, they have revived annual fees; shortened  billing cycles; levied new charges on cards with low credit limits;  increased balance-transfer, cash-advance and foreign-exchange fees; and  begun aggressively marketing &#8220;professional cards&#8221; not subject to the  restrictions of the Card Act.</p></blockquote>
<p>Silver-Greenberg&#8217;s excellent report should be read <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703778304575590823786685984.html" target="_blank">in its entirety</a>.  And be sure to follow this advice she offers:</p>
<blockquote><p>Before signing up for a new card offer, borrowers should find out  whether services like payment protection are automatically included. And  once borrowers start using a card, they should pore over their  statements each month in search of billing changes. If they notice a  higher minimum payment or a new fee, they should contact the card issuer  immediately, say consumer advocates.</p></blockquote>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/banks-find-more-ways-to-stick-their-hand-in-consumers-pockets.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies that claim to settle credit card debts face new rules</title>
		<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/companies-that-claim-to-settle-credit-card-debts-face-new-rules.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/companies-that-claim-to-settle-credit-card-debts-face-new-rules.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt collection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/?p=4212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Times:  Federal Trade Commission chiarman Jon Leibowitz said the new rules “will stop companies who offer consumers false promises of reducing credit card debts by half or more in exchange for large, upfront fees."
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>New York Times</em>:  The <a href="http://www.ftc.gov" target="_blank"><strong>Federal Trade Commission</strong></a> has approved new restrictions on companies that say they will help reduce or settle consumer credit card debts, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/30/business/30debt.html" target="_blank">reports</a> <strong>Edward Wyatt</strong>.   FTC chiarman <strong>Jon Leibowitz</strong> said the new rules “will stop companies who offer consumers false promises of  reducing credit card debts by half or more in exchange for large,  upfront fees.&#8221;</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/companies-that-claim-to-settle-credit-card-debts-face-new-rules.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capital One challenged on increasing &#8220;fixed&#8221; interest rates</title>
		<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/capitol-one-challenged-on-increasing-fixed-interest-rates.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/capitol-one-challenged-on-increasing-fixed-interest-rates.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/?p=4141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reuters:  A federal appeals court in California reinstated a lawsuit against Capital One, after the company more than doubled the interest rate it charged a cardholder who thought she had a "fixed" APR.
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reuters</em>:  A federal appeals court in California reinstated a lawsuit against <strong>Capital One</strong>, after the company more than doubled the interest rate it charged a cardholder who thought she had a &#8220;fixed&#8221; APR.  Reporter <strong>Jonathan Stempel</strong> <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2116752120100721" target="_blank">quoted</a> plaintiffs attorney <strong>Behram Parekh</strong> as saying, <span id="articleText">&#8220;Consumers were being misled by having the word  &#8216;fixed&#8217; in their agreements, when the card company could change the terms at will.&#8221;</span></p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/capitol-one-challenged-on-increasing-fixed-interest-rates.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chase cardholder fights back after accounts closed</title>
		<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/chase-cardholder-fights-back-after-accounts-closed.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/chase-cardholder-fights-back-after-accounts-closed.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/?p=4110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times:  Chase's failure to respond to his lawsuit in a timely manner may cost it a $2 million judgment.
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Los Angeles Times</em>:  Business columnist <strong>David Lazarus</strong> <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-lazarus-20100720,0,2718013,full.column" target="_blank">tells the story</a> of a San Diego man who decided to fight back after <strong>Chase</strong> told him it was closing his credit card accounts.  The company&#8217;s failure to respond to his lawsuit in a timely manner may cost it a $2 million judgment.  &#8220;Maybe next time Chase will take it more seriously when a customer stands  up for himself and demands a little justice,&#8221; Lazarus writes.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/chase-cardholder-fights-back-after-accounts-closed.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Congress has (and hasn&#8217;t) done for consumer financial reform</title>
		<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/what-congress-has-and-hasnt-done-for-consumer-financial-reform.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/what-congress-has-and-hasnt-done-for-consumer-financial-reform.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit scores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/?p=3882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Times:  "A roundup of some of the biggest consumer issues that members of Congress addressed and where they ended up."
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>New York Times</em>:  <strong>Ron Lieber</strong> and <strong>Tara Siegel Bernard</strong> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/your-money/26money.html?nl=&amp;emc=aua1&amp;pagewanted=all" target="_blank">present</a> &#8220;a roundup of some of the biggest consumer issues that members of  Congress addressed and where they ended up,&#8221; including the creation of the <strong>Consumer Financial Protection Bureau</strong>, new protections for mortgage purchasers, and changes that affect credit and debit card use.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/what-congress-has-and-hasnt-done-for-consumer-financial-reform.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

