-
What’s at stake for women and minorities in the Wal-Mart class action
Friday, March 25, 2011 � by jg
New America Media: With the U.S. Supreme Court set to hear arguments Tuesday on whether a sex-discrimination suit against Wal-Mart can proceed as a class action, Nina Martin spoke with the former executive director of Equal Rights Advocates about why the outcome is important to women and minorities.
-
Dan Rather previews the Supreme Court arguments on the Wal-Mart gender discrimination case
Friday, March 11, 2011 � by jg
Huffington Post: The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments about whether the case can proceed as a class action on March 29, and Dan Rather has produced a report about the case for HDNet.
-
With friends like Altria and Bank of America…
Monday, September 27, 2010 � by jg
Bloomberg: Altria (parent company of tobacco products maker Philip Morris USA) and Bank of America are among 19 companies that have filed amicus curiae briefs in support of Wal-Mart Stores appeal of an employment discrimination case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
-
N.Y. Times: Wal-Mart employment practices “deserve a full hearing”
Tuesday, August 31, 2010 � by jg
New York Times: In an editorial, the Times urges the U.S. Supreme Court not to block a class action lawsuit accusing Wal-Mart of discriminating against female workers in pay and promotions.
-
Arbitration clause doesn’t let Hooters off the hook
Thursday, August 26, 2010 � by jg
Detroit Free Press: A Michigan judge has ruled a mandatory arbitration clause in Hooters employment contracts does not prevent the company from being sued for discriminating against waitresses based on weight.
-
Are background checks in the hiring process discriminatory?
Thursday, August 12, 2010 � by jg
Associated Press: refusal to hire job applicants based on criminal or credit records can be illegal if it has a disproportionate impact on blacks and Latinos.
-
Novartis to pay $150+ million for gender discrimination
Thursday, July 15, 2010 � by jg
New York Law Journal: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. will settle remaining gender bias claims by employees who had alleged they were discriminated against in pay, promotion and in pregnancy policies.