No related posts.

No related posts.

By NANCY WRIDE

Mayra Fornos had big dreams, and they’d all come true by age 24. Newly married to a handsome USC student, Fornos lived across the street from the sands of Manhattan Beach, he a surfer bound for law school, she the tall and stunning fashionista. The future seemed set: He would become a lawyer; she would launch a career in apparel marketing.  She was already one of three top models in Los Angeles that shaped Guess and other brands in the $2 billion jeans industry. She’d already been a Rams Cheerleader.

Then, it all cratered, with the break of a wave.

Attorney Mayra Fornos at her law firm in Los Angeles. Photos: Lori Shepler

On that day in 1979, six months before graduating USC, Ralph Fornos walked into the waves with his board, and had to be carried out.  Perhaps a wall of water slammed him to the ocean floor, or he hit a sandbar. He floated to the surface alive, but unmoving, a quadriplegic.

In the years that followed, her husband’s life in a wheelchair drastically changed hers.  “After my husband was injured, he said ‘that’s it. We have to change the world,’ ” Fornos recalls proudly. It started with Fornos turning the pages of his law books. Immersing herself to help him with classes at University of West Los Angeles School of Law, Fornos decided to become a lawyer herself, and practiced with her husband until his death in 2002.

She views the Americans with Disabilities Act as the greatest civil rights law passed since the Civil Rights Act itself.

Today, it’s fair to say that Mayra Fornos is the only lawyer in Southern California whose entire workforce is either paraplegic or quadriplegic.  She is one of the best-known Los Angeles attorneys specializing in Americans with Disabilities Act claims, and a widely respected advocate for the profoundly injured.

Working tirelessly both in and out of court, she has changed access policies, she has changed bicycle safety routes, she has changed hospital protocols. Friends say she never focuses on the money, but the cause. She has helped found two charities for the disabled.

She has done it, say her colleagues, with an approach that is blissfully ego free in a profession that typically is not. Steve Heimberg, a Los Angeles medical malpractice attorney and physician who works frequently with Fornos, put it this way: “She has fairy dust.”

And a firm resolve. When defense firms see Fornos is on the case, Heimberg said, they bring in their biggest guns for the battle. Even those who have jousted with Fornos in court respect her – and her devotion to the rights of the disabled.

“She’s an excellent lawyer, but even more impressive than her legal skills is her passion for the ADA and her pursuit to preserve the true intent behind the ADA,” said Kathleen Hunt, a Los Angeles lawyer who has sat opposite from Fornos.

Fornos isn’t after technical violations, added Hunt. “Her concern is to really make people aware that those with physical disabilities can and should have access and equal enjoyment to properties, places, just like anyone else.”

That devotion carries into her Century City office with the team she has assembled. Three of her associates are paraplegic. Two are quadriplegics. That they are impressive goes without saying – but their manner says something about Fornos, as well.

Across the street from Fornos’ Century City practice, she and associate attorney Mark Willits, 29, of Woodland Hills, talked about how he was paralyzed from the lower neck down. He breathed through a ventilator as an assistant fed him.

He had just turned 16, and was helping unload a semi-trailer on his family’s small town Iowa farm, 1,200 acres of corn, soybeans and a 100-cow herd.  A bunch of wood fell on top of him, causing catastrophic C2 and C3 injury.

“Think about it: he can’t breathe on his own but since his injury, he has graduated UCLA law school, he has gotten married, he holds a job and he’s bought a house,” Fornos said. “What people can do if given a chance – there it is.”

Willits would not minimize the staggering degree of mental trauma one lives through with this kind of tragedy. But neither does he dwell, allotting just a couple of sentences to define his fate.

“I wanted to die. But I eventually realized that I had to move on with life, and I had a very strong family to support me,” he said. Earning his law degree and passing the California bar were big turning points. His role is to recruit clients who seem in need of legal or life help, and to screen the cases for the firm. “Mayra is empathetic and passionate about helping people,” Willits said simply.

Each of her half dozen workers is devoid of self-pity, willing to share how they came to be permanently injured, well moved-on from the dark days of wanting to die or hide from the weight of their own thoughts about the future.

Brianna Walker of Anaheim was a former dancer and legal secretary when she crashed her car in a sleep-deprived state and was paralyzed. Her life in a wheelchair is as full as it ever was – she practices law with Fornos and, along with Willits, helps run the charities Ralph and Mayra established.

Left to right: Mark A. Willits, Briana Walker, Mayra M. Fornos, Anthony R. Orefice III and Robert Rohan. Photos by Lori Shepler.

Walker and her co-workers share a matter-of-fact confidence about their capabilities and no self-doubt about their standing at the firm. There, Fornos and her team have represented cases of malpractice and discrimination and won damages and access for the disabled into places where barriers once stood – schools, amusement parks, workplaces, public spaces.

But the case she’s really arguing is the rights of her clients to have a life.

It sounds so simple, and yet it never is, and nobody knows this better than Fornos, part of why she is so effective in cases she fights herself and those she works on with other lawyers, some at big firms with the resources to power the lengthier battles. She has teamed with some of the top personal injury and medical malpractice lawyers in Los Angeles, among them longtime CAOC leaders Bruce Broillet and Heimberg.

“Her own view of what is important and which of her cases are the biggest is different than a lot of attorneys,” Heimberg said. “They are not the money cases they’re the cause cases – and virtually every case of hers that I am aware of is a cause case.” In the hard-knock legal world, Fornos operates “on the goodness method.”

“I think she is quite unique in the country,” said Heimberg – and he isn’t just talking about her team of lawyers in wheelchairs.

During her years of marriage, Fornos became well aware of what it actually means for a wheelchair-bound person to not be able to use a public restroom. It is not just the indignity or potential humiliation – it’s a potential health hazard. Robbed of a place to relieve themselves, they can experience extreme high blood pressure and a risk in some cases of dying.

In her first semester at law school, Fornos took a course in constitutional law from a professor that would become the most influential person in her professional life: the late California Appellate Justice Bernard Jefferson. He was also president of the law school.

Jefferson, who authored the California Evidence Benchbook, took Ralph Fornos under his wing – and the university did likewise, making its campus more accessible to he and other disabled students. Fornos was inspired to apply her experience as the wife of a quadriplegic living a full life.

“It was perfect timing and meant to be,” said Fornos. “The ADA passed in 1990, and went into effect in 1992. We passed the bar in 1993. We were maybe among the first lawyers to really focus on it.”

In those days, people who worked with the couple said their palpable romance and connection was evidence of what life could be for the wheelchair-bound.

“I met Mayra and her late husband many years ago. I think it was at a disabilities expo, and they were shopping for new vans and wheelchairs,” said Tommy Hollenstein, 49, an advocate and former client of Fornos. She won a discrimination case on his behalf. He is now an artist beloved in the disabled community. Hollenstein can’t use his hands, instead drizzling paint as his electronic wheelchair moves on canvas. He then rides through with his wheels to complete the picture. He became a minor celebrity for doing this with his dying guide dog, whose paw prints cut a path through the paint alongside his wheels.

Hollenstein was 24 when he rode his mountain bike off a dirt hill in a San Fernando Valley accident in 1985 and landed in a trench. He does a lot of volunteer work today in one of two charities Fornos founded or helped create. Ralph’s Riders, named after Fornos’ husband, is a support group where the disabled can learn everything from resources and product information to how to go on a first date in a wheelchair.

“They were an amazing couple,” Hollenstein said of Mayra and Ralph. “They clearly loved each other.”

Mayra and Ralph Fornos

In disability parlance, it’s called “not seeing the chair.”

Her personal experiences quite obviously color everything Fornos does in the courtroom and in her law practice. It is difficult to include all that Fornos involves herself with, the scope of her impact, because it is widely recognized as ridiculously surpassing the law. While she’s known in the legal world for her disability rights work, Fornos sees herself more broadly. On top of winning settlements and justice for her clients, she seeks help and support for them.

“I want to be helping the whole person, from the time they are injured to getting them resources and support,” Fornos said.

She would be the first to point out that there are attorneys out there filing bogus claims about disability discrimination that are out for the money, and she is particularly sensitive to the small business person’s frequent complaint that they can be shaken down for minor technical violations of the complex law. She is, after all, a small business owner herself with a small staff of six.

Said opposing counsel Hunt, “she’s really for the cause more than just a quick settlement.”

Fornos said she couldn’t help but be changed by her husband’s accident and her life with him as a quadriplegic. “Yes, you can win people a lot of money, but now what? You have to help people with that. I wake up every morning with the joy of that. Asking, how can I get them to change their mind today, and see this differently, at a job or a government office? Had I not gone through the pain, really, I’d just be a lawyer.”

Nancy Wride is a journalist and local editor reporting news for the Long Beach website, Belmontshore.patch.com

All photos: Lori Shepler

No related posts.

Both the number of people who took the exam and the percentage that passed were slightly lower in 2010 compared to 2009.  The percentage of first-time exam takers that passed in July was 68.3%, while the percentage of repeaters that passed was 21.6%.  A total of 4,690 people passed the exam, with a full list available on the State Bar of California website.

Broken down by gender, the pass rates for first-timers were exactly the same for men and women, while the pass rate for repeaters was slightly higher for women (22.0% to 21.2%).  Almost half (49.0%) of those taking the exam for the first time were women.

Graduates of California law schools that are approved by the American Bar Association had the best chance of success in the exam.  Among first-timers, 75.2% from those schools passed, while the pass rate for graduates of ABA-approved schools outside California was 68.1%.  First-timers who were graduates of California accredited law schools not approved by the ABA passed at a rate of 40.4%.

Graduates of schools not accredited by the state and not approved by the ABA did not fare well in the exam.  Only 23 of the 115 first-time exam takers from those schools passed (20.0%), and of the 442 repeat exam takers from those schools, only 57 passed (12.9%).  Faring particularly poorly were graduates of California Southern Law School in Riverside (3 of 33 passed, combining first-timers and repeaters), American College of Law in Anaheim (1 of 27), Peoples College of Law in Los Angeles (0 of 10), Pacific West College of Law in Orange (0 of 13) and the University of Northern California, Lorenzo Patiño School of Law in Sacramento (0 of 23).

The law school that had the most graduates taking the bar exam for the first time who passed was Loyola Law School of Los Angeles.  The California school that had the highest percentage of its graduates who took the exam pass was Stanford Law School; 89 of its 91 graduates passed.  Here is the complete list of ABA-approved law schools in California, listed by first-timers pass rate:

* La Verne was provisionally approved by the ABA in 2006; that approval was withdrawn in June 2011.

Two California-accredited schools that are not ABA-approved deserve mention.  Eleven of the 13 graduates of Empire College School of Law in Santa Rosa who took the exam for the first time passed (85%), while 23 of 37 graduates of San Joaquin College of Law in Clovis passed (62%).  Two other such schools also had higher pass rates than some ABA-approved schools:  Monterey College of Law in Seaside (4 of 6, 67%) and Glendale University College of Law in Glendale (6 of 11, 55%).

Among out-of-state ABA-approved schools, all 23 Yale Law School graduates who took the California bar exam for the first time passed, marking the second straight year Yale grads recorded a perfect score.  Also perfect was the University of Chicago Law School; all 17 of its graduates who took the exam for the first time passed.  Here are the pass rates for all out-of-state schools that had at least 20 graduates take the exam for the first time:

Georgetown led all out-of-state schools with 79 graduates who took the bar exam for the first time in July, followed by Harvard with 78.  NYU was a distant third with 53, edging out Michigan with 51.

The State Bar website has complete data from the July 2010 exam, as well as data from both the February and July administrations of the exam going back to 1997.

–J.G. Preston

No related posts.

No related posts.

Lerach, as we reported earlier, was freed from prison in early March after pleading guilty, with some of his partners at Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, to paying folks to serve as plaintiffs in class-action lawsuits. The case brought to an end the career of one of the most influential, and feared, plaintiffs’ attorneys in the country.

And it was a spectacular hubris-driven collapse, which was detailed in the recent “Circle of Greed: The Spectacular Rise and Fall of America’s Most Feared and Loathed Lawyer” by investigative reporters Patrick Dillon and Carl M. Cannon (I reviewed the book this weekend for the Los Angeles Times).

Now the National Law Journal is reporting that Lerach is in talks with the UC Irvine School of Law about teaching a course: “Regulation of Free Market Capitalism — Why Have We Failed?” Lerach also told the San Diego Union-Tribune that he wants to teach the course at a wide range of law schools, and that he also hopes it will count toward his required 1,000 hours of community service. Meanwhile, he’s volunteering for a veterans’ groups and a German shepherd adoption program.

Oh, and Lerach offered the Union-Tribune his own review of “Circle of Greed.”

The book is very tough on me, and it certainly exposes a lot of my faults and mistakes. I guess we all wish we were perfect but we are not, and when you have two very good investigative reporters comb through 35 years, it comes out with some blemishes for sure. On the other hand, the book presents how hard my law firm worked on behalf of our clients and how much we achieved against extremely powerful and influential interests. So, I can’t complain about the way the book came out even if I might want to change some things.

No related posts.

No related posts.