<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Protect Consumer Justice &#187; U.S. Chamber of Commerce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/tag/u-s-chamber-of-commerce/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org</link>
	<description>A source for consumer, legal and political affairs news. Special reports, breaking news and analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:12:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trading places: U.S. Chamber pledges to use lawsuits to tackle Obama regulation</title>
		<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/trading-places-u-s-chamber-pledges-to-use-lawsuits-to-tackle-obama-regulation.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/trading-places-u-s-chamber-pledges-to-use-lawsuits-to-tackle-obama-regulation.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 22:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Page One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil justice system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Chamber of Commerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/?p=4424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The traditionally anti-litigation business umbrella group decides to embrace the art of legal weaponry to overcome regulation it considers bad for business.
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proving that what goes around comes around, the traditionally anti-lawsuit <a href="http://www.uschamber.com/" target="_blank"><strong>U.S. Chamber of Commerce </strong></a>is pushing ahead with a litigation strategy meant to thwart the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/" target="_self"><strong>Obama Administration</strong></a>&#8216;s efforts to tame greenhouse gases, tackle rising health care costs and reign in Wall Street.</p>
<p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=11824880" target="_blank">Published reports </a>say the chamber is launching its new, more aggressive legal stand as election day nears in a race that some pundits predict could end with chamber-allied Republicans gaining control of the House of Representatives.</p>
<p>&#8220;Litigation is one of our most powerful tools for making sure that  federal agencies follow the law and are held accountable,&#8221; said <a href="http://www.uschamber.com/about/management/thomas-j-donohue" target="_blank"><strong>Thomas Donohue</strong></a>, the chamber&#8217;s president and chief executive.</p>
<p>Reuters reported that two senior Democratic congressional officials said their view was that  the chamber was effectively operating as an arm of the Republican Party  during the current campaign. But the Democratic officials said they did  not want quotes attributed to them for fear of unduly antagonizing the  chamber.</p>
<p>The biggest outcry was by the chamber&#8217;s traditional critics. <a href="http://www.justice.org/cps/rde/xchg/justice/hs.xsl/default.htm" target="_blank"><strong>The American Assn. of Justice</strong></a>, the umbrella group for the nation&#8217;s trial lawyers, roared on its Twitter account that the chamber was engaging in bald hypocrisy by suddenly embracing litigation as its best weapon, <a href="http://www.uschamber.com/press/speeches/2010/regulatory-tsunami-how-tidal-wave-regulations-drowning-america" target="_blank">immediately after chamber president Donahue complained about lawsuits.</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Hypocrites at chamber now LOVING lawsuits,&#8221; <a href="http://twitter.com/JusticeDotOrg" target="_blank">the AAJ said on Twitter</a>. &#8220;Don&#8217;t they always whine about &#8216;frivolous litigation.&#8217;?&#8221;</p>
<p><em>&#8211; Eric Bailey</em></p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/trading-places-u-s-chamber-pledges-to-use-lawsuits-to-tackle-obama-regulation.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The latest from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (and Mark Twain)</title>
		<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/the-latest-from-the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-and-mark-twain.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/the-latest-from-the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-and-mark-twain.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Page One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute for Legal Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Chamber of Commerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/?p=4374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know that old Mark Twain saying that "figures don't lie, but liars figure." Was he envisioning the Chambers ILR as he penned that enduring insight?
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This being the campaign season, yet <a href="http://www.instituteforlegalreform.com/component/ilr_media/30/pressrelease/2010/512.html" target="_blank">another poll would seem a yawner</a> &#8212; unless it comes from the <a href="http://www.uschamber.com/" target="_blank"><strong>U.S. Chamber of Commerce&#8217;s</strong></a> resiliently supercilious  <a href="http://www.instituteforlegalreform.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Institute for Legal Reform.</strong></a></p>
<p>In what it calls a &#8220;bipartisan poll,&#8221; the ILR suggests that small businesses in the U.S. are pessimistic about the nation&#8217;s economic future and believe the economy is destined to remain stagnant for the next year. Two thirds contend the government is taking actions better left to business and individuals, and three quarters of business people feel it will be bad for the economy if Congress passes laws allowing those darned lawyers to file more lawsuits. Two thirds believe lawsuits are on the rise and will continue to balloon in the coming years.</p>
<p>Whew. Hold the mayo, and give me a big scoop of pessimism.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-4376" title="Mark_Twain" src="http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Mark_Twain-150x150.jpg" alt="Mark_Twain" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>We all know that old <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Twain" target="_blank"><strong>Mark Twain</strong></a> saying that <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mark_Twain" target="_blank">&#8220;figures don&#8217;t lie, but liars figure.&#8221;</a> Was he envisioning the Chambers ILR as he penned that enduring insight?</p>
<p>Certainly the folks who answered the call of duty to take the phone and Internet survey the last two weeks of August by <a href="http://pos.org/" target="_blank"><strong>Public Opinion Strategies</strong></a> freely offered those gloomy views of the economic world and the state of civil litigation &#8212; at least they felt that way once they were coaxed by the proper polling question. But what does such artifice really tell us?</p>
<p>Perhaps that sometimes clever survey questions and ill informed answers seem to matter more than the truth.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the truth: A poll digging into the opinions of business owners about the number of lawsuits in America seems downright silly given that the number of lawsuits in America is an actual number that can be discerned simply with a bit of digging.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.caoc.com/temp/ts_40ECEEC5-A5CA-AEF8-4BA1A682C7CCBE6F40ECEED4-A76E-2AA8-733D19EBA30E71DE/NoLitigationExplosion.pdf" target="_blank">The facts are that tort filings &#8212; the type of civil litigation reputedly bedeviling business &#8212; have declined 24% during the decade preceding 2007</a>. That&#8217;s according to the <a href="http://www.ncsc.org/" target="_blank"><strong>National Center for State Courts</strong></a>, an outfit that prefers to deal in facts instead of using figures to fib. Medical malpractice claims, meanwhile, declined 9% and product liability cases fell 4%. Auto cases fell by 23%.</p>
<p>It gets better. The<a href="http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/" target="_blank"><strong> Bureau of Justice Statistics </strong></a>found that the number of tort trials in the nation&#8217;s 75 largest counties fell more than 31% and the median damage awards in those counties dropped 18%.</p>
<p>There was one type of litigation that rose during the same period &#8212; disputes over contracts, which typically involve businesses suing other businesses, jumped 37%.</p>
<p>So much for the sky-is-falling survey by the U.S. Chamber.</p>
<p>Add to all this the chamber&#8217;s use of small business people as a fig leaf to hide its own true purpose. <a href="http://www.fixtheuschamber.org/what-chamber/us-chamber-not-small-not-local-and-not-what-it-claims-be" target="_blank">The U.S. Chamber is anything but a representative of small business, according to the group <strong>U.S. Chamber Watch</strong>. </a>The vast majority of the chambers funding comes from gigantic corporations, whose interests are quite different than those of small businesses. During the health care debate, for instance, the chamber took money from big insurance companies and lobbied against regulations that would have reduced the cost of insurance to small business owners. The same thing happened during the debate over Wall Street reform, with the chamber opposing changes that could have helped protect small business.</p>
<p>Moreover, the chamber&#8217;s claims that it has 3 million members have been undercut by reality &#8212; a <a href="http://www.fixtheuschamber.org/what-chamber/us-chamber-not-small-not-local-and-not-what-it-claims-be" target="_blank"><strong>Mother Jones</strong></a> investigation pegged the number at one-tenth that, about 300,000.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s listen to Mark Twain and do our best to cut through the U.S. Chamber rhetoric meant to shield big business from legal accountability when wrong is done. Civil justice and the American public will be safer for it.</p>
<p><em>&#8211;Eric Bailey</em></p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/the-latest-from-the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-and-mark-twain.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;5 ways the U.S. Chamber of Commerce shills for BP&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/5-ways-the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-shills-for-bp.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/5-ways-the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-shills-for-bp.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Chamber of Commerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/?p=3937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mother Jones:  The Chamber is opposed to a ban on deepwater drilling, lobbied against a bill that would allow victims of the gulf explosion to sure for damages, and opposes lifting the cap on BP's liability for damages caused by the gulf catastrophe.
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Mother Jones</em>:  <strong>Josh Harkinson</strong> lists &#8220;<a href="http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/06/5-ways-chamber-shills-bp" target="_blank">5 Ways the Chamber Shills For BP</a>,&#8221; including its opposition to a ban on deepwater drilling, lobbying against a bill that would allow victims of the gulf explosion to sure for damages, and opposition to lifting the cap on BP&#8217;s liability for damages caused by the gulf catastrophe.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/5-ways-the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-shills-for-bp.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a corporate remake of the Ohio Supreme Court reduced protection for injured workers</title>
		<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/how-a-corporate-remake-of-the-ohio-supreme-court-reduced-protection-for-injured-workers.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/how-a-corporate-remake-of-the-ohio-supreme-court-reduced-protection-for-injured-workers.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate campaign contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Chamber of Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/?p=2828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Millions of dollars in corporate campaign spending led to the election of sympathetic judges who upheld the law after it had been struck down earlier.
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>ThePopTort.com</em>:  The <strong>Ohio Supreme Court</strong> has upheld a 2005 state law that means, according to the author of <a href="http://www.thepoptort.com/2010/03/judicial-elections-have-consequences.html" target="_blank">this post</a>, &#8220;knowingly putting a worker in harm’s way will not expose an employer to liability.&#8221;  After the court had struck down an identical law in 1999, millions of dollars in corporate campaign spending led to the election of sympathetic judges who upheld the law after it was repassed by the Ohio legislature.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/how-a-corporate-remake-of-the-ohio-supreme-court-reduced-protection-for-injured-workers.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Chamber backs off &#8220;membership&#8221; claim</title>
		<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/u-s-chamber-backs-off-membership-claim.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/u-s-chamber-backs-off-membership-claim.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Chamber of Commerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/?p=2415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mother Jones:  The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has stopped saying it represents more than 3 million businesses on its news releases. 
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Mother Jones</em>:  <strong>Josh Harkinson</strong> <a href="http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/02/chamber-commerce-no-longer-represents-3-million-businesses" target="_blank">reports</a> the <a href="http://www.uschamber.com/default" target="_blank"><strong>U.S. Chamber of Commerce </strong></a>has stopped saying it represents &#8220;more than 3 million businesses and organizations of every size, sector, and region&#8221; on its news releases.  The group&#8217;s membership is actually about one-tenth that size.  Harkinson writes, &#8220;It would be more accurate to say that the Chamber &#8216;represents the interests of a small number of big-business donors that profit from polluting the environment and exploiting their workers.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/u-s-chamber-backs-off-membership-claim.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Chamber of Commerce math: 52% = 8%</title>
		<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/u-s-chamber-of-commerce-math-52-8.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/u-s-chamber-of-commerce-math-52-8.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Chamber of Commerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/?p=2332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is running a false ad claiming that "52 percent of all lawsuits" target small businesses. The claim is contradicted by the very study the Chamber cites as its source, and it’s not even close to the truth. The study shows the true figure is somewhere between 5 percent and 8 percent.
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>FactCheck.org</em>:  <strong>Brooks Jackson</strong> <a href="http://factcheck.org/2010/01/us-chamber-more-lawsuit-malarky/" target="_blank">reports</a>, &#8220;The <strong>U.S. Chamber of Commerce</strong> is running a false ad claiming that &#8217;52 percent of all lawsuits&#8217; target small businesses. The claim is contradicted by the very study the Chamber cites as its source, and it’s not even close to the truth. The study shows the true figure is somewhere between 5 percent and 8 percent.&#8221;</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/u-s-chamber-of-commerce-math-52-8.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Help Wanted: &#8216;Respected&#8217; economist seeking fat pay check</title>
		<link>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/u-s-chamber-of-commerce-looks-to-paint-health-care-reform-as-job-killer.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/u-s-chamber-of-commerce-looks-to-paint-health-care-reform-as-job-killer.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Chamber of Commerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/?p=1103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Chamber of Commerce is seeking $50,000 to pay a "respected" economist to report on the impact of federal health care legislation on jobs.
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Washington Post:</em> <a href="http://www.uschamber.com/default" target="_blank">U.S. Chamber of Commerce</a> is <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/15/AR2009111503159.html?wpisrc=newsletter">seeking $50,000 </a>to pay a &#8220;respected&#8221; economist to report on the impact of federal health care legislation on jobs.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.protectconsumerjustice.org/u-s-chamber-of-commerce-looks-to-paint-health-care-reform-as-job-killer.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

